Observations and Thoughts

A thread for abridged thoughts and observations, or for responses to locked threads.

------------------------

The " Men going their own way " ( MGTOW ) movement is the corollary of feminism, the flip-side of the coin. " For every action there is an equal and.....". A movement that was, initially, supposed to be about equal rights and fairness has turned into a cultural monstrosity. Though the ostensible benevolence of feminism won over the minds of many, the nefarious spirit was there the whole time, under a pretense.

From my observation, many women don't know how to articulate their innermost feelings, which is kind of ironic, considering that women are supposed to be more verbally adept than males. If you ask the average female to explain what she finds desirous in a man, she will stagger in her explication. Women are more sensitive to emotions, passions, the subtext of phenomena --- they are more intuitive. A woman can feel, can sense what she likes in a man, but once you ask her to explain her feelings, she will go blank. Another plausible factor in this is the meme vs gene dichotomy; the social norms and conventions of a given society may contradict, or shame a woman's natural, sexual proclivities. These women are in conflict between living up to the values ( memes ) of their social environment and their primal, female natures. This can lead to unhealthy contradictions, neuroses. And this is also why many females will often say one thing, for example, that they like gentlemen, who are sensitive and respectful, but in practice, on the other hand, they always end up dating or being attracted to the ruffian, aggressive alpha-male. Meme vs Gene. Societal values suggest that women ought to find the quiet gentleman to be attractive ( meme ), but primal-female nature suggests the opposite, that they be attracted to the rugged, indifferent " cow-boy " figure.

A beautiful mind cherishes isolation, as that is what allows him to experience the fullness of his being, whereas the wretch abhors it; it's when he is at his personal nadir.

The grinch, in his petty and miserable existence, seeks out others who he can infect with the poison that torments him daily. For him, the thought of others enjoying their lives, above and beyond what he experiences, is too much to bear. The only thing that can alleviate him of this is to cause others to feel miserable, too. He spends his days shouting and hollering at the wall, which he mistakes for listening ears --- lambasting others, pointing out their flaws, in order to curve the fiery arrow of criticism away from his own self. It's a coping mechanism, the product of a weak mind.

The grinch claims to be a champion of isolation, he asserts that he would rather be away from humanity, but deep down inside, he longs to reunite with it. This is his need.

I've resided in the abode of the dead.

Thoughts on why lesbian women never approach each other directly in social situations...

I noticed something, because they are still fundamentally female, and as we know females in nature don't usually make the first move because of the aspect of submissiveness, so a man usually dominantly does. With lesbians if they like each other, they will try to get intoxicated as much as possible and then out of frustration throw themselves on to each other and aggressively kiss, as a way of over riding that aspect to being female because they can't bring themselves to just approach each other normally.

The male is the asserter and the female is the receiver, of course there is always exception but generally and fundamentally speaking. Another exception would be the group situation, the social gathering eases the tension sort of like a lubricant making it a lot easier for them to approach each other often done through others...

If we are talking one on one, you will rarely see one single lesbian woman walk up to another single lesbian woman and just introduce herself, even if they like each other, there will just be casual looking. What will happen is, one of them will "take it to the dance floor", again, another lubricant sort of like an acceptable filter. She will get drunk and dance on her own hoping the other one will approach in the same manner, but none of it is direct, it's all indirect until they get up close and then just throw themselves on to each other as a way of breaking the ice.

Where as a man in such a situation, will just quite literally just walk up to a single girl anywhere and introduce himself directly because it's within his nature, that very nature is lacking among two females because they are both fundamentally female despite their sexuality, I would even go as far as saying their masculinity too (the ones that applies to) doesn't have much of an overall effect on this neither, in terms of making the approach easier, the closest she will come to directness is quite blatantly being directly hostile (towards her or trying to find mutuality in a form of complaint towards something), the aggressiveness is produced as a frustration that stems from the attraction conflicting in will of the fundamental part of being female. She wishes to over come it but "can't find it within her" to do so, yet their is a desire which comes in the form of attraction, whether it be physical, social, emotional etc.. They use alcohol, social groups, dancing or what have you, to sort of short circuit it, but even then it's still incredibly hard for them because that fundamental part of being female is so deeply rooted. A male in such a situation would create the natural flow, a gateway or a simple path for things to process accordingly with very little difficulty. With that said, I would even suggest that all the aggression, abuse and self harm with lesbians comes out of this social internal conflict.

When it comes to doomsday or alien invasion scenarios, the human mind usually pictures the invading force as giant ant insect looking creatures, this is because the human mind has a natural fear for anyone bigger than themselves, also the human mind finds the look of ant insects to be ugly and disgusting, and there is also a fear there too. In such a alien invasion scenario the human simply combines the two creating worse combinations that already exist but just magnified.

mannequin wrote:

When it comes to doomsday or alien invasion scenarios, the human mind usually pictures the invading force as giant ant insect looking creatures, this is because the human mind has a natural fear for anyone bigger than themselves, also the human mind finds the look of ant insects to be ugly and disgusting, and there is also a fear there too. In such a alien invasion scenario the human simply combines the two creating worse combinations that already exist but just magnified.

I think there may be an inborn phobia of insects in humans and, to a lesser degree, of reptiles --- hence the reptilian conspiracy theory. There are evolutionary reasons for this, of course; many insects and reptiles can cause harm. Also, the way many insects look corresponds to modern depictions of extra-terrestrials: Big buggy eyes, green, lanky, etc.

To add to your lesbian observation entry, I think everyone has noticed that many, if not most, lesbians dress and try to act masculine; and many homosexual-males try to act feminine. But when someone mentions the elephant in the room, people go berserk and cast aspersions. To acknowledge reality is now considered to be uncouth and offensive.

Some people long to create, to produce something of value and to be known for something as a way of dealing with their existence, the creative process becomes a way of managing and maintaining, the resulting product allows the individual to live longer, to live louder and give themselves the validation they need which also makes death easier to deal with.

An individual who struggles with the creative process or producing the resulting product, and stays in the longing to create stage for too long starts to lose hope and self-belief, and procrastinating becomes a comfort of sorts, which covers up fear, doubt and uncertainty regarding creation.

When the individual finally overcomes the doubt and produces something of value, an impressive piece or a useful beneficial product, he/she is shocked by this, followed by an intense relief and glee, but is not usually "good enough" to have any real impact on the longing duration process and the suffering accumulated during that time, therefore, when somebody else commends or congratulates that person for what they have created, this triggers a deep sadness and misery because they are finally getting the recognition that they have always wanted, but do not feel deserving of it and never will.

Erik wrote:

[

To add to your lesbian observation entry, I think everyone has noticed that many, if not most, lesbians dress and try to act masculine; and many homosexual-males try to act feminine. But when someone mentions the elephant in the room, people go berserk and cast aspersions. To acknowledge reality is now considered to be uncouth and offensive.

I also noticed that gay/lesbian bars are highly secured with bouncers for obvious reasons, but the bouncers themselves were also homosexual just more of a masculine variety. The possible reason could be that a hetereosexual masculine man may find it very naturally difficult to protect the weaker feminine male of a sexuality that he might find fairly disgusting and threatening...but these things are never spoken about..right ?

Back in the day, celebs use to wear sunglasses and hoods, and various other disguising items to stealth themselves whenever they were in public. Now since that superficiality has taken off and so many celebs have constructed their persona and characters in gimmick form, the items they use ARE their identity!.. Such as Bono with his glasses, lady gaga with her wigs and outifts and niki minaj etc..They simply have to remove the items for themselves to be stealth in public

There's power in numbers, when the strength accumulates it often presents itself in a very seductive manner. Take a religion for example, when a specific religion ,where social benefits are well defined, is growing and becomes very popular it often seduces people, particular women in this case. Then the religion itself takes the credibility and the excessive conversions are classified as "proof" or automatic validation that the religion is true..

People who find themselves locked up in prison usually have naturally violent tendencies and characteristics, so that outcome is usually very predictable as they develop "criminal minds" as a results of their genetics.

The state naively thinks that introducing religion as a heavily taught subject in prison will somehow rehabilitate the criminal, not realizing that the nature of the beast doesn't change. As a result of this, their criminal minds get transferred into theology, if the individual believes the religion, then the criminal mind expands beyond petty typical social crimes into something far more dangerous, a world wide domination, the mind also draws comfort and confidence from other members who reinforce the same believe and behaviour...and most importantly, the mind now has a personal justification ( God ) which will attempt to overthrow any human law. Oh the irony ..

Damian Rzeszowski

Quote :

The court heard that Rzeszowski's marriage had been under strain after his wife confessed to a two-month affair

So yeah, he decided to kill his entire family..


Butttt for some extra bonus points, he decided to off his wife's father, her friend and her friend's child..





Slightly over the top, or justified?

I also might add that he has some excellent physical genes.....which probably adds to his excellent stabbing ability...hand eye coordination..etc

So, went the stabbing route, eh? Not the conventional shoot em' up with a shotgun?

Never understood why they decide to liquify the entire family...

Erik wrote:

So, went the stabbing route, eh? Not the conventional shoot em' up with a shotgun?

Never understood why they decide to liquify the entire family...

Yeah, I guess he had trouble finding a gun, or perhaps he thought the stabbing routine would inflict more pain.

I also didn't understand the killing of the entire family, If it was calculated, it would make more sense if he killed everybody except his wife, so she can live with pain of all the loss, a type of revenge punishment, but no, he killed her too..

So, i imagine it was an outburst, then he came to the house with intentions of killing her, felt like he would kill his kids too, as he was going to kill himself (he tried committing suicide but survived)..this is like an undoing of things, he doesn't want his children suffer growing up without his parents, so just take them too.

When he got there, I don't think he expected anybody else to be there, so he felt like he had to kill them too in order to control the situation, i believe he killed his wife's father first, this eliminates the male's strength and the most likely candidate who has a chance of physically fighting, now with him out of the way...it would be easier...I bet his wife's  friend had something to do with the affair too, you know, the type of women who encourages her friends to cheat and they both secretly laugh about it..well not with this guy...everybody dying!!!

Mannequin wrote:

So, i imagine it was an outburst, then he came to the house with intentions of killing her, felt like he would kill his kids too, as he was going to kill himself (he tried committing suicide but survived)..this is like an undoing of things, he doesn't want his children suffer growing up without his parents, so just take them too.

I was thinking this exact same thing, just a sec. ago; makes sense, actually.

And yes, I wouldn't be surprised, if the female friend encouraged the affair; there are tons of women like that these days.

I've noticed that females, when they are alone, are fairly amicable. But when they group together, with their female friends ( 5 or more ), they turn into a pack of ravaging wolves lol. I think it's a power-in-numbers thing; they feel more comfortable expressing their natural bitchiness, and it just turns into a colossal circle-jerk from there, where each member leeches off the other's histrionic and obstreperous behavior.

At some point, we are all going to have to start putting some serious thought into dedicating our lives to something, as a way of escaping modern trivialisation of human life, a lot more than what we do now. Let's just be honest about this, it's a pretty disgusting time period.. Just look at women, look at how much dedication they are putting into all this anti-male shit that's been going on for a god damn long time.

Although, i don't particular side with the mgtow group (even though I am one fairly naturally)..but I can understand where they are coming from.. I want to see them take that all the way to the end, shake the modern world up a little bit...

( Meant to post this here )I find myself nodding my head in agreement with many of the things stated in the mgtow movement, too. But at the same time, most of the members are petty and weak-minded. It's a very popular and rapidly growing movement. In the upcoming years, it will be a force to be reckoned with.

A good idea would be to create a sophisticated underground gang, we communicate through technology discreetly and our aim is to push drugs around the entire world. We will be known as AoE!.. Academy of Excellence gang.

mannequin wrote:

A good idea would be to create a sophisticated underground gang, we communicate through technology discreetly and our aim is to push drugs around the entire world. We will be known as AoE!.. Academy of Excellence gang.

Well, yes - that is my aim here, sort of; I'm trying to push out intellectual ' drugs', to facilitate an environment, where people can inject themselves with top-notch intellectual stimulants. The neotic experience par excellence: reaching the mental OM-gasm of philosophical enlightenment. Will you help me make fiends of scholars?

Erik wrote:

Well, yes - that is my aim here, sort of; I'm trying to push out intellectual ' drugs', to facilitate an environment, where people can inject themselves with top-notch intellectual stimulants. The neotic experience par excellence: reaching the mental OM-gasm of philosophical enlightenment. Will you help me make fiends of scholars?

What is the ultimate objective?

Mannequin wrote:

What is the ultimate objective?

I was sort of kidding with you.

Your participation here is sufficient, keeping this place alive and running.

I'm not trying to change the world; just trying to create a nice online philosophy forum, where people can dialogue, esp. about politically-incorrect topics that can't, usually, be discussed in person.

The home represents who that person is, a controlled environment put together in whatever way one wishes to be seen. The owner hides all the dirt whenever guests are invited over to reinforce a specific perception. With a homeless person there is no home, no box and no controlled personal space. Everything is out in the open, the dirt in all forms is visible..

mannequin wrote:

The home represents who that person is, a controlled environment put together in whatever way one wishes to be seen. The owner hides all the dirt whenever guests are invited over to reinforce a specific perception. With a homeless person there is no home, no box and no controlled personal space. Everything is out in the open, the dirt in all forms is visible..

So true ^^^

A person's house, esp. their room, says a lot about who they are. It's like peering into their psychology.

The passive weak type of modern man will intentionally and carelessly consume large amounts of food and let his personal hygiene subside, thus resulting in people presenting an aversion towards him, a type of defence mechanism that he hopes is enough to exempt him from the natural competition and antagonism that comes with life, sometimes it backfires...